Evolutionary Indoctrination
Monkey Stalkers
It’s good that we don’t try our citizens in court in the manner in which we try the theory of evolution in our educational arena. I would imagine that a district attorney would present a very appealing argument regarding the guilt of an innocent individual in the absence of a defense attorney. Or, that an articulate …defense attorney might make a serial killer out to be a saint in the absence of prosecution.
Such is the case regarding evolution. There is data that conflicts with and even refutes points that the evolutionists have built their foundation upon, yet they are not entertained, nor are they mentioned. And this is referred to as education? I would liken it to indoctrination.
Here’s another argument… The evolutionists like to lean on biochemical similarities among living organisms as ‘proof’ that all descend from one common ancestor. What if we all come from one designer. One who designed all in a similar manner?
Take penmanship as an analogy…
One could write thousands different poems on similar themes. Each poem, written with a similar structure, containing words that are composed of varying combination and length of the twenty-six letters wh
ich comprise the alphabet. Since all of the poems were composed by one author, the poems will very likely be similar in structure, theme, letter composition, word use, penmanship, etc.. Yet for all of their similarities, each is uniquely different.
Though each poem might be influenced by its predecessor, or by all of its predecessors on the whole, one poem did not evolve into another. Neither do the specifics of each grant closer relation to another in any way other than the relation to the motivation or feelings of the author at the time of its penning. Similarly, organisms are similar, but only in the respect that each organism shares the same creator rather than the same ancestor.